Every project with a decent insulation and two solar panels on the roof seems to call itself “sustainable building” these days, no matter how conservative the materials that were used.The truth? That business-as-usual has little to do with real sustainability. This weekly newsletter is for contractors, architects and clients who want to understand what actually matters to build better.
Share
🏗️ No water. No concrete. No buildings.
Published 6 days ago • 5 min read
Hey Reader,
When I first looked into the impact on water at my employer three years ago, the initial conclusion was almost embarrassingly simple.
We don’t consume much freshwater. A bit for the toilets. The coffee machine. Our precast concrete production runs on stored rainwater.
Most buildings today designed according to BREEAM or similar standards often use little water during operation.
So the initial reaction is to assume construction does not really have a water issue.
But then you realise that your project might be in a high water stress area and you’re much more dependent on water than you might think.
What the heck is water stress?
Water stress measures how much pressure human activities place on local water resources.
Surprisingly, parts of Europe score very high on this metric. Flanders, the northern region of Belgium, is one of them.
For real. Despite all the rain.
Belgium ranks 18th out of the 25 countries in the world that experience extreme water stress every year. It is the only northern European nation that high in the ranking.
Dark red = extreme high water stress
Let me explain why Flanders specifically is in trouble.
No natural water storage. Belgium has almost no natural lakes. There is nowhere to hold water when it rains. Compare that to Germany, where Lake Constance alone supplies drinking water to entire regions including my former hometown. Or Denmark, where a different geology creates natural buffers. Belgium has nothing comparable.
Sixty percent of available water drains to the sea. In total, around 60% of all water available in Flanders flows lost to the sea via rivers, drainage systems and sewers. It rains enough. The water simply leaves before it can be used.
Extreme soil sealing and high population density. Almost the complete triangle from Ghent to Antwerp to Brussels is urban area. That density means concrete, asphalt, driveways, parking lots, terraces. Surfaces that rain cannot penetrate.
The combined result is a imbalance between what Flanders withdraws and what is actually available.
Flanders uses over 80% of its renewable water supply every year. Water stress becomes extreme when that ratio crosses 80%.
Almost no region in the world at that level has a rainy climate. Flanders does.
Which role does construction play?
The built environment is itself a cause of Belgium’s water stress problem.
Green areas are progressively replaced by concrete and asphalt, preventing water from infiltrating the soil and recharging groundwater systems.
Every new impermeable surface a contractor builds makes the regional groundwater situation worse. There is a direct link between construction activity and the depletion of the very resource construction depends on.
In Flanders, over ten years, from 2013 to 2023, more than 21,000 hectares of sealed surface was added, an average of 5.8 hectares per day. The biggest contributors are not new buildings. They are roads, driveways, terraces and parking areas.
Fred Debrock - soil sealing
And then there is dewatering.
When you dig deep enough to hit the water table, you pump the water out.
On a 40 by 25 metre construction pit with two underground levels, that is around 100 m³ per hour.
In Flanders, around 90% of that pumped groundwater ends up in the sewer.
On sites where the water is not contaminated it is essentially clean groundwater. Infiltration back into the soil, reuse on site for dust suppression or cleaning are all better options.
Once it enters the sewer, it is gone.
Water withdrawal - Vlaamse milieumaatschappij
Dependencies
We speak often about the impact of construction. Too much CO2. Too much waste. Soil sealing.
But we don’t speak that often about dependencies. Me included, to be honest. It’s more complex.
And yet, it goes much further than the regular sustainability topics.
Dependencies literally explain whether and how much you depend on something. These dependencies could distract or stop business operations.
So which dependencies are there with water?
Transport via waterways. Concrete plants, precast manufacturers and contractors depend on waterways to move huge quantities of material.
Soil removed from construction sites. Precast elements. Steel structures.
Inland shipping is often the only realistic option for the volumes involved.
When river levels drop during drought, that supply chain stalls. The Rhine and the Albert Canal have seen cargo restrictions in recent dry summers. It is a dependency most construction companies have never mapped.
Transport of precast elements via water - C-concrete (Temse, Belgium)
Water as ingredient in concrete. It is so obvious that we tend to forget it.
Water is a key ingredient of concrete. Between 150 and 190 litres go into every cubic meter.
Droughts are a risk. Spain’s industrial sector faced a 25% water allocation cut during the Catalonia drought in 2024.
No water equals no concrete. Concrete producers, and everyone in construction using their product, are clearly dependent on a reliable water supply.
Multinational Holcim is already acting on this. Their plant in Tit Mellil (Morocco), now uses treated municipal wastewater for concrete mixing instead of freshwater. A dedicated tank and pump system connected to a local wastewater treatment facility. They report a 30% reduction in freshwater withdrawal at that site.
Holcim has committed to a 15% reduction in freshwater withdrawal across the ready-mix segment by 2030.
Holcim
Access denied to drinking water connections. You have probably heard about grid congestion in the Netherlands and parts of Belgium. Developers cannot get electricity connections. Projects stall.
The same thing is now happening with water.
By 2024, Vitens, the largest Dutch drinking water company, had refused 45 companies a new drinking waterconnection. They have warned that new residential developments in some areas may not be connectable to the drinking water network at all.
We are not speaking about sub-Saharan Africa. It’s the Netherlands.
Where it stopped: Port of Urk, Flevoland. Port of Urk is a new 100-hectare industrial development zone in the Ijselmeer area, designed specifically for the expansion of the Dutch fish processing industry. Roads and sewers have been built. Plots have been sold.
But the fish processing businesses hoping to establish themselves there cannot get a drinking water connection for large-scale use.
There is a stop on all new large connections for the entire region. No structural solution is expected for at least ten years.
Port Of Urk (Netherlands)
Take-away
Let’s stop taking water for granted.
While the immediate costs are low, the implications can be huge. Especially on the dependencies side. Every impact increases the chance that dependencies become constraints.
Three things worth doing now.
Start measuring water withdrawal on your construction sites. Not just consumption. Dewatering volumes included. Most companies have no idea what these numbers are.
And on deep excavation projects, have the conversation about dewatering water early. Infiltration on site is almost always the best answer where the water quality allows it.
Check whether your projects are in water-stressed areas.
Scroll the map to your project or office location and zoom in.
Once a location hits the dark red end of the scale, it means more than 80% of available renewable water is being withdrawn every year.
The red area is high water stress and there are plenty. Southern Netherlands, Berlin, Southern-Western Germany.
Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas
On the left panel you can switch between layers. Baseline water stress is the main one to understand.
But also worth checking: groundwater depletion and riverine flood risk. Together they give you a realistic picture of both drought risk and flood risk for any project location.
One practical step: before your next project kicks off, run the location through Aqueduct. It takes two minutes and it will change the conversation in your first project meeting.
Did you try out the tool, Reader? Where are your projects located?
Disclaimer
This newsletter represents my own thinking, not that of my employer or the boards I sit on. I write it because I find the topic important not on anyone’s behalf.
Every project with a decent insulation and two solar panels on the roof seems to call itself “sustainable building” these days, no matter how conservative the materials that were used.The truth? That business-as-usual has little to do with real sustainability. This weekly newsletter is for contractors, architects and clients who want to understand what actually matters to build better.
Hey Reader, In June 2019 I attended a talk in Leuven. I had just moved to Belgium six months earlier. My Flemish was not great, but I went anyway. The ZIN project was presented that evening. A massive office complex in the Brussels North district. The architect explained what they were going to do: not demolish and rebuild from scratch, but treat the existing towers as a material bank. The concrete would be crushed and reused. Ninety percent of the materials would stay in the loop somehow....
Hey Reader, I just came back from a training on nature-inclusivity in construction. Spend a full day at TU Eindhoven with great input from the project partners of the Interreg project “natuur-inbouw”. We also got a tour over the campus where we saw more than 150 building-integrated nestboxes. The same week I saw the five shortlisted designs for a competition in Rotterdam that finally triggered me to write this edition. “Sustainable construction” is a world of trade-offs. You have probably...
Hey Reader, Over the past months you may have noticed something new appearing in sustainability reports, websites and tenders: nature and biodiversity. It’s like in the early 2010s with carbon emissions. Companies started announcing targets that back then no one could differentiate. Carbon neutrality, CO2-neutral, net zero….It was a bit of a wild west. Howdy cowboys! Nature and biodiversity seem to be entering a similar phase. Banks are starting to ask questions. Complex frameworks are coming...